When Refinery 29 launched its ‘The 67%’ campaign, I, along with many women were excited about the platform-wide acknowledgment of the erasure of plus-size women from mainstream media. It’s no secret that body preference across magazines and the Internet is a real thing, as we are constantly bombarded with images of women who, frankly, just don’t look like most of us. Even with a couple of our champions, from Gabby Fresh to Ashley Graham, a few names representing a large segment of the female population just isn’t enough.
According to the campaign, 67% of American women are size 14 and above, yet they only represent 1% of the body types actually present in media.
#tbt I am me. I am curvy. I have lumps and bumps and marks that have shown the life I have lived. To others they may be unappealing but to me my body is a trophy. A trophy of struggle, of triumph and I intend to celebrate it in all its glory. I'm grateful for the miles this body has walked, flown, and run to take to me to all of the amazing places this world has to offer and will continue to do so. I'm grateful for the endless times it has carried me through dark and into the light even when I didn't think I had anymore strength. Lastly I'm grateful that my body doesn't expect but accepts. It is healing and glorious and resilient. I'm grateful for this body. -B #grateful #glory #body #bodypositive #positivity #curves #curvy #marks #stretchmarks #thighs #raw #me #love #beauty #selflove #refinery29 #brittneeblair
The difference between Refinery 29’s push for plus size women and other similar campaigns, is for once, a publication took responsibility for the part they played in perpetuating the invisibility of certain body types on their platform. In their launching op-ed, they made a vocal commitment to restructure their on-site representation to be inclusive.
This celebratory effort turned painful when the site released a tone-deaf survey, intended to point out the implicit bias of their audiences. The survey asked for readers to associate certain adjectives and attributes to specific body types. Titled ‘Here’s What You Really Think Of Other Women’s Bodies,’ the questionnaire asked 1,000 participants questions like “Would you be her friend,” “Would you trust her with my children/future children,” or “Would you follow a brand if she were the spokesperson.”
The findings were expectedly cruel and superficial. Skinnier white women had positive associations; however, the thicker and darker in complexion the models got, the more crass the word associations became.
As a final culminating point, a plus-size Black woman was labeled the ‘least acceptable woman’, ranking low on desirability, attractiveness, intelligence items.
The model, Brittnee Blair, whose image was used to represent this body type, posted the photo on Instagram. She captioned the photo with a heartbreaking note–asking how celebration turned into condemnation so quickly:
The other day I'm being congratulated on my body, today is another story. But that's the way it goes. This is super messed up. But also a reassurance of why I continue to do what I do. We are not all cookie cutter and you most definitely cannot judge a book by its cover. For those of you who know me, you know that I love the outdoors, being active, dancing, and eating healthy. I also enjoy Netflix, and icecream and indulging in a carb every now and then. Balance. We cannot change society by simply saying "change". We must start the change with ourselves and by learning that we're being force fed unattainable images and ideals by media. We are the ones that must say no, and we are the ones that can define "beauty". @refinery29 #shoutouttothe1000 #idwanttobemyfriendto #istilllovemybody #iwanttobreakbarriers
The image is triggering given the historic discrimination against black bodies–particularly female bodies within our society. The idea that Black women are ‘least acceptable’ substantiated centuries of rape, ‘othering’ and exploitation. I immediately took to Twitter to address the issue head on. Tweeting to Kelsey Miller, Senior Features Editor at Refinery 29, I opened up a dialogue on why this image and language was so problematic and hurtful to women of color:
What was impressive was her response, and openness to having the conversation between women:
The survey and the subsequent backlash served as a reminder that even when we are trying to have representative conversations, if there is no intersectionality involved to color the discussion from a racial, socio-economic, sexuality and gender perspective, then there will always be sink holes. As the adage goes, ‘The road to hell is paved with good intentions.’ There needs to be women of all shapes, sizes and backgrounds in the ideation room to have a rich conversation about imagery.There are nuances within every community that have to be acknowledged.
You can’t erase bias by just telling people, ‘Hey, you are biased.” You have to constantly reinforce images that are routinely linked to negative associations with positive word reinforcement. You have to do this repeatedly,until the ugly roots of bias are pulled out and replaced with understanding. Hopefully, involved conversations like the social media talk above will begin to take place more often, so no site has to issue retractions for something they would’ve known if they had just asked us. The website has since adjusted their language to convey their core point without ostracizing plus size Black women.
A campaign about representation begins with representation. Go figure.